Border
         
¦     Graphics Products     ¦     Resistant Materials     ¦     Systems & Control     ¦     Textiles     ¦
 
Year 10 Project Information
How To...
   
  Cruise Liner Project
Introduction and Brief
Research
Side elevation of cruise ship
Vacuum forming
Evaluation
   
Orthographic Exercise
   
   
   
 
GCSE Graphic Products results for Summer 2004

This year, 53% of students met or exceeded expectations, 8 students did not reach the A* as predicted, but were infact awarded grade A. The following students pleasingly exceeded their predicted grade:
Sophie Cooper, Hannah Drury, Lara Seaton, Victoria Ward and Hui Chan. These students were all given individual guidance outside of lessons. In particular, Hui was able to attain grade A*, yet she had no experience of D&T before joining the school in year 10. She needed extra tuition in order to cover the specification requirements, this was arranged during lunchtimes and after school hours.

Disappointingly, there has been a drop in the grades awarded for this subject over the past year, form 71% to 54% achieving A & A*.
The coursework element of the examination contributed favourably to most students’ grade, many achieved over 90% for this unit alone. However, the following students produced coursework that did not reflect their ability, resulting in lower grades than expected:
Charlotte Coleman (C), Harriet Couchman (B), Gwennan Evans (D), Keely Fuller (B), Stephanie Gargan (C), Emma Merrells (C), Emily Morrison (B), Rebecca O’Brien (B), Jennifer Owens (B), Nicola Palmer (B), Natasha Preocanin (B), Eleanor Roberts (B), Charlotte Rowe (B), Jocelyn Stockbridge (B), Sarah Taylor (C), Clara Thompson (B).

Possible reasons for their underachievement are:
· failure to gain access to an IT room on a regular basis: the subject specification demands a high level of ICT skills, both in the use of computer aided designing (CAD) and in manufacturing (CAM), but invariably there are no ICT rooms available for booking during year 10 lessons;
· too many students in the class: in both GCSE classes there were 28 students, this figure is too high for a practical subject. Added to this there were 4 new students who had no previous experience of design & technology and needed special attention. This difficulty was remarked on by a large number of pupils during a post examination evaluation session carried out last July.

The examinations proved rather difficult for some students, in particular the second paper. Using the increased contact time allocated for Year 10 technology lessons this year, EWO has been planning and implementing a weekly examination revision session to improve pupils’ abilities in this area. It is expected that this will boost the marks for the examinations in June 2005.

 

 
 
 
     
         
Copyright
   
 
   
Border